00:00
00:00
View Profile whazzat

48 Movie Reviews

13 w/ Responses

1 reviews is hidden due to your filters.

your movie

gave me a seizure. I give extra points for seizures!

What a great dad

I wish I could blow up the moon!

I dont really want to review

I just want to remark that this is the first time I've ever seen 100% vote turnout for a movie before. At this point, there are 108 votes for 108 views. That means there's something about this animation that compells people to vote. . . getting an initial response like that is something in itself.

RLL-BABY responds:

WHAZZATTTTT????? YOU LIKKKKEDDDD ITTTT????? KEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@#######$$$$$$$%%%%%%^^^^^&&&&****(())))___++++

pretty funny

The fuzzy sock did not help, it muffled the voice files way too much. Here's something you can do instead of using a sock:

Get a large mixing bowl. Hold it up sideways, positioning the mic so that it's pointing into one side of the bowl, but not touching it. Start recording and speak into the other side of the bowl. This eliminates the sound of your breath hitting the mic and gives you crystal clear voice files.

Pretty funny movie, worth a 4. People should only blam complete crap, not movies that have obviously been toiled over. Good work! :)

FreshLaundry responds:

Hmm.. must be one hell of a sock! I just used my fiance's ankle sock and spoke with a crosswind over the mic, not directly into it. But I love your idea too.. as long as it doesn't sound like you are in a cavern or something. Thanks for the tip!

Old Joke.

Very old. You draw well, though. You could have cut the whole walking scene by half, at least. Keep trying.

Cops

may not always be right, but we need them. Your bonus video was not a real occurance, it was staged. But it's pretty damn funny, anyway. Pretty good 3D work, did you do it in Swift?

James-Ball responds:

yea

Good graphics. . .

But it's missing something conceptually.

Clever

This was cute. You're right... people should read the darn play.

Well. . .

I partly agree. I think that there's no reason to be unnecessarily cruel when reviewing a movie. I think the many suggestions I have seen in reviews for the Flash Author to commit suicide are way over the top and juvenile. The animation features of Flash are not that difficult to learn, but putting out good work is time consuming and tedious. However. . .

If you see a piece of dog shit on the sidewalk, do you approach the dog who made it to explain to him how to make a better turd? No. But you might turn to a friend about to step in it and say, "watch out for that poop!"

When people submit movies that look like they took less time to create than they did for the viewer to download them, it pisses other people off. It's like internet trash, it serves no purpose. It's a waste of the viewer's time and disk space, a waste of NewGrounds bandwidth, and most especially, a waste of the author's energy. So when I see repeated "what a piece of shit!" in reviews and a low rating, I kind of view it as a warning from other people to avoid this particular piece of poop. You can't improve poop.

Nice work

Looking forward to what you submit with this type of style. The facial shots look like they went through some kind of 3D rendering. Good friggin job!

I'm old, don't bother me.

Age 53, Female

caffiene tester

Yeah, I went.

Illinois

Joined on 3/4/02

Level:
13
Exp Points:
1,730 / 1,880
Exp Rank:
35,813
Vote Power:
5.51 votes
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
92,396
Blams:
35
Saves:
23
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
1